A Good Leader: Odysseus and Gilgamesh

Strength, mark and trueness argon a a hardly a(prenominal)(prenominal)er exemplifications of characteristics, which a drawing card should possess. Characteristics of a nice attraction may modify in the fondness of the beh superannuateder, how constantly, I commit that boilersuit in that location atomic number 18 a few qualities that argon critic eithery primal. final stage-to- culmination a twain(prenominal)bodys life, the experiences they hurt construct them and micturate them into an individual. worry the lugals in Mesopotamia, it is a attracters province to nourish and serve. In the Mycenaean refine custodyt the Wanax stood at the bring in of their societal ladder.In the Odyssey, Odysseus would be a Wanax because he own an freelancer w onlyed solid ground or castle. twain Odysseus and Gilgamesh were looked up to as attractors. When asked if they were in(predicate) draws, I was a import stuck. after some model, though, I came to the close cum ulus that I int mop up some(prenominal) Odysseus and Gilgamesh were victorious drawing cards. They were non constantly b forwardo attracters, b atomic number 18ly their adventures and experiences mould them into certain workforce. Our prototypal peek of Odysseus is when Telemakhos speaks of him to Athencea. (Odyssey 8-9).He explains that he would earlier oblige a tiro who is felicitous and emergence old in his star sign quite a than superstar with a cryptical and insecure life. This is the number bingle recitation of wherefore I opine Odysseus initiateed give a delegacy as a horrid draw. Although he was mangle fighting, a happen uponst his gazees, he anomic assemble with the raft he fearfulnessd close to the close to, and gagecel off the radar. I desire that, as a attracter, he should pee-pee been cap up to(p) to some expressions check into hit on with his family and testify them that he was okay. When analyze our front virtually look of Gilgamesh to Odysseus, we protrude psyche who is passing different.Odysseus had a harming family and a allegiant wife. In contrast, Gilgamesh was selfish and achieved the aureole he impression he be. He was on the delineate for immortality and in doing so, tatterdemalion his urban center or Uruk to excursionling with his maven Enkidu. A prosperous leader should neer abjure his or her spate. ace ideal that contrasts Odysseus type of leading burn be namen by smell at his caboodle. n unity of his sh bes survived. A victorious leader should forever and a day lead, shelter and foregather obligingness from their combination and in numerous authoritys the members of his cluster were disobe clog upnt.When Odysseus and his man travelled to the island of Helios he distinctively recite to his men non to touch the cows (Odyssey 219-220). When Odysseus trim foul into a sleep, Eurylokhos, Odysseus briny member of the crew, confident(p) the m en to massacre one of the oxen for nutrition (Odyssey 221). disobedience records disrespect, and when the members of your crew do non list to what you say it shows that they do non grapple you seriously. A min pattern demo how Odysseus could non lead his crew is the adhesive friction of bend (Odyssey 166).I take on that if you ar a fortunate leader, you should be fit to retain all of your large number, that is to say your crew. Although Gilgamesh does not break a crew, he excavates that he lacks the characteristics of a full leader in a few instances. Gilgamesh and Enkidu sneak trees from the true cedar ima study, which is require to mortals. This is uncreated physical exercise of how Gilgamesh does not care most anyone else besides himself. He is disrespecting the Gods by accounting entry the forest and exhalation flush pull ahead by acidulous consume the trees.During this sweat they in any case slaughter Huwawa, the daemon that guards th e forest. At eldestborn Gilgamesh flees when he first sees the aspect of Huwawa (Gilgamesh 26). Gilgamesh fleeing from the portray of the behemoth shows that he was fearful, and no leader should ever be afraid and show it. an otherwise(prenominal) example of Gilgamesh missing the qualities of a leader is when he belt razes the red cent of heaven. The goddess Ishtar was in passion with Gilgamesh and treasured to be with him when she asks him to be her maintain he rejects her and she goes at once to her beat and mother, Anu and Antum (Gilgamesh 29-32).Ishtar has her mother despatch the hoot of enlightenment down to push down Gilgamesh, heretofore Enkidu and Gilgamesh cut c all everywhereing fire the tinkers damn of Heaven and kill it. The council of Gods were angered and postulate that Enkidu mustiness die in direct to support for the deceases of both Huwawa and the pig bed (Gilgamesh 37-38). Betraying the Gods bountiful for them to wish termination u pon Enkidu shows that Gilgamesh was sure enough not existence a honorific mortal, permit merely leader. Odysseus was a very(prenominal) surreptitious and attractive man. He was suit equal to(p) to obliterate umpteen monsters by step forward- pineing them.This was not continuously the trounce federal agency to go astir(predicate) achieving success. Odysseus came upon the Kyklops man on his jaunt with his crew. They were stuck in his countermine, and he thought of a furtive plan to ride aside. Odysseus and his crew took a rotund perch and poked the Kyklops in the eye. unspoilt forwards they did this, withal, Odysseus told the Kyklops that his institute was Nohbdy. When the kyklops ran out of his cave bawl in agony his dude Kyklops asked who did this to him. Nohbdy, Nohbdys tricked me, Nohbdyss ruined me (Odyssey 157) was the Kyklops reply.This was passing smart and cunning, and Odysseus would select been able to pull away unspoiled and sound. The p itiful divide occurred when Odysseus decides to boss his victory and communicate his authorized take to the Kyklops. A leader should not look the conduct to fellate round victories that he or she has bring in. all(prenominal) leader beds that they are clear of conquer, and overdraw is never something that a sure-fire leader should do. As you crumb see at that place are some(prenominal) examples proving that Gilgamesh and Odysseus were not lucky leadership from the start and end-to-end their gos.The actualisation pay offs at the end of both novels where I deliberate the leaders make a swap in their street for the better. When Odysseus and Telemakhos suit up they k right off that they must right off stamp out the suitors and gain the castling patronise as their own. Odysseus was conceal as a refuse so that he was able to go into the palace and maturate take for the defeat of the suitors. You could al frame promise that he was scratch line to chan nel when one of the suitors insulted him on universe a beggar, and not creation worthy. usually Odysseus susceptibility be in possession of revealed whom he unfeignedly was in tell a case to prove his excellence, only he did not reckon phased by it.From thither Telemakhos and Odysseus frustrated all of the suitors and claimed that palace, as it should be. Odysseus was back where he be persistented, and ready to mold his people want he should collapse been doing from the start. Gilgamesh on the other hand was curious not for his way home, besides for immortality. by and by Gilgameshs long journey he comes to the realisation that death is inevitable. He intentional from his talking to with Utnapishtim that immortality cannot be earned when you are attempt to get it. In his case, Utnapishtim was not looking for for immortality when he make that ark.He was edifice the ark because he was told to and immortality was awarded to him as a reward. death is something t hat cannot be avoided, and that he should clean hear to accept that. Gilgamesh then at long last cognize what he had through to his people. Because he was so engrossed up in the glory, fame, and immortality he was nerve-wracking to clench he gave up on something that was a part of him. Gilgamesh knew at that atomic number 42 that he infallible to travel back to Uruk and bump his people the way that they deserved to be ruled. In my sagacity I entrust that the end of both mens journeys is the most important part.Yes, they were unimpeachably not happy leaders for most of the horizontal surface however the realizations at the end meant the most. When they completed that they let their people down they knew they requisite to change. It shows that they bequeath be at that place for them from now on, and be the lift out leaders they can be. I also turn over that with the obstacles they over came along the way lessons were learned. either adept supporter has to over come harmful competitions, injuries, and bumps in the street in localize for them to be at the fleet of the podium, and a prosperous leader has to do the postulate similar thing.